▲No repository linkflaggedNo repository field found in SKILL.md frontmatter. Skills without a verifiable source repository cannot be externally audited.vettd · scan · 4wInfo
▲Description includes usage contextflaggedGood: description explains when to activate the skillvettd · scan · 4wInfo
▲Progressive disclosure usedflaggedSKILL.md body references files in references/, scripts/, or assets/ — agents can load additional context on demand instead of consuming everything upfrontvettd · scan · 4wInfo
▲Description within character limitflagged52/1024 characters usedvettd · scan · 4wInfo
▲Examples includedflaggedFound code blocks, input/output samples, or an examples section — concrete samples help agents pattern-match effectivelyvettd · scan · 4wInfo
▲No prompt injection or jailbreak signals detectedflaggedScanned text content for instruction override, jailbreak framing, credential solicitation, and embedded injection markersvettd · scan · 4wInfo
▲references/ directory presentflaggedAdditional documentation files available for progressive disclosurevettd · scan · 4wInfo
Not assessed; no producer has emitted into reliability & quality for this asset. That is different from a check that ran and found nothing, which the record would carry as a row of its own.
+Performance◌ not assessednot assessed0 signalsrecord ea68bc83-60ac-4d97-9b87-69c73a239405
how it was establishednot assessed; no producer has emitted into this category
Not assessed; no producer has emitted into performance for this asset. That is different from a check that ran and found nothing, which the record would carry as a row of its own.
+Cost◌ not assessednot assessed0 signalsrecord ea68bc83-60ac-4d97-9b87-69c73a239405
how it was establishednot assessed; no producer has emitted into this category
Not assessed; no producer has emitted into cost for this asset. That is different from a check that ran and found nothing, which the record would carry as a row of its own.
+Compatibility◌ not assessednot assessed0 signalsrecord ea68bc83-60ac-4d97-9b87-69c73a239405
how it was establishednot assessed; no producer has emitted into this category
Not assessed; no producer has emitted into compatibility for this asset. That is different from a check that ran and found nothing, which the record would carry as a row of its own.
▲References external URL — review for indirect prompt injection riskMedium
▲No evaluation test casesInfo
▲No scripts/ directoryInfo
▲No secrets or unsafe code patterns detectedInfo
▲SKILL.md presentInfo
▲No repository linkInfo
▲Description includes usage contextInfo
▲Progressive disclosure usedInfo
▲Description within character limitInfo
▲Examples includedInfo
▲No prompt injection or jailbreak signals detectedInfo
▲references/ directory presentInfo
▲Valid name fieldInfo
▲Step-by-step workflow foundInfo
▲SKILL.md body length is reasonableInfo
▲Validation loop referencedInfo
Popularity
●Forks55858
●Days since last commit0 days
●Open issues50422
●Stars256002
●Watchers985
Characteristics
▪Archivedfalse
‹ › or arrow keys move through 22
Coverage3 of 7 categories assessed · shown
Safety
✓ assessed
assessed as findings and a letter grade, not as signals
Reliability & Quality
△ not assessed
no producer has emitted for this category
Performance
△ not assessed
no producer has emitted for this category
Cost
△ not assessed
no producer has emitted for this category
Compatibility
△ not assessed
no producer has emitted for this category
Popularity
✓ assessed
5 signals recorded
Characteristics
✓ assessed
1 signal recorded
Freshness & re-evaluation
assessed4w ago · Cisco AI Defense · Vettd core○ untracked
source stateThis asset is not yet covered by scheduled change detection.
re-check policyno re-check is scheduled for this assetnot scheduled
re-run whena new release ships, the upstream source changes, or the scanner ruleset is revisednot scheduled
Limitations & open conflicts
limitationReliability & Quality, Performance, Cost, Compatibility are not assessed: behaviour there is unmeasured, not clean△ gap
conflictno two sources report the same quantity on this record
Verify: does this record describe your copy?
What record ea68bc83-60ac-4d97-9b87-69c73a239405 covers
scannerv9△ superseded by v11
validityassessed 4w ago · Staleness unknown
$vettd scan folder <path>
this record was taken at digest sha256:ffdeb7080e4f… compare it against the digest your own scan prints
Reproduce: re-run the evidence yourself
$vettd scan folder /path/to/your/copy
runs the same scanners against your own copy; the published record is never overwritten
How this record comparesagainst other published records · full comparison →
Signal kinds
▲ finding: something to act on, carries a severity● measurement: a reproducible quantityƒ estimate: inferred from a sample▪ fact: read directly off the artifact◆ classification: assigned from a taxonomy◌ nothing found: a producer looked and emitted no object◇ context only: described, never graded
Custody marks
◐ computed by vettd○ declared by the publisher, as-is△ not assessed: nothing looked
Weigh agentmail against other published skills: the safety grade, its finding counts and each category’s verdict, one row apiece. The full comparison page carries every signal and framework coverage.