github-pr-review-session
Human-reviewer co-pilot for ZeroClaw PR reviews. Use this skill when the user wants to review a specific PR as themselves, re-review a PR after author changes, work through a queue of PRs, check what's still open on a PR, or post a formal review verdict. Trigger on: 'review 1234', 'can you look at PR #1234', 're-review 1234', 'check 1234', 'what's still open on 1234', 'go through the queue', 'next PR', 'review the open PRs'. This skill posts reviews in the voice of the active `gh` account holder using gh CLI.
Only notes were reported. Notes are information, not problems.
No finding sets the security severity.
Open findings →d83f6baSource unchanged, checked Oct 28, 2026Historical result (archived, not the current assessment)
- Source badge at capture
- Archived Pass as archived
Archived explanation: Skill failed: 0 hard fails in skill checks.
Pass and Fail now belong to Framework checks.
Scanners, signals and record facts
- Assessed
- Oct 28, 2026
- Content hashA Git tree SHA of the skill's folder. It identifies the files that were assessed. It is not a commit.
d83f6ba- Next source check
- Oct 29, 2026
- Files
- 1 in the skill, 1 with findings (File structure)
- Record ID
30471bb
github-pr-review-sessionWhich scanners reported what
| Scanner | Run | Security severity reported | Security findings | Other findings | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vettd | Completed | None reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
cisco | Completed | Informational | 0 | 0 | 1 |
The overall score is A. It counts findings in every category. Security severity is Informational, the highest security finding across the scanners that ran (vettd reported none reported; cisco reported informational). No captured run is recorded for snyk, socket and gen-trust-hub.
Security findings
- Note
What this assessment does not cover
Static checks only, not a safety guarantee. What this does not cover
- Static checks only. Nothing in the skill was run.
- Pages linked from SKILL.md were not fetched or checked.
- This record is not signed yet, so you can't verify it came from Vettd unchanged.
- Name, description, author, version and license are shown as the author wrote them. Vettd didn't verify them.
- Cost, runtime characteristics and usage are not assessed.
- Framework checks (OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025): not assessed for this record.
github-pr-review-session
Human-reviewer co-pilot for ZeroClaw PR reviews. Use this skill when the user wants to review a specific PR as themselves, re-review a PR after author changes, work through a queue of PRs, check what's still open on a PR, or post a formal review verdict. Trigger on: 'review 1234', 'can you look at PR #1234', 're-review 1234', 'check 1234', 'what's still open on 1234', 'go through the queue', 'next PR', 'review the open PRs'. This skill posts reviews in the voice of the active `gh` account holder using gh CLI.
Only notes were reported. Notes are information, not problems.
No finding sets the security severity.
Open findings →d83f6baSource unchanged, checked Oct 28, 2026Historical result (archived, not the current assessment)
- Source badge at capture
- Archived Pass as archived
Archived explanation: Skill failed: 0 hard fails in skill checks.
Pass and Fail now belong to Framework checks.
Full record · metadata, license, scanners and provenance
- Assessed
- Oct 28, 2026
- Content hashA Git tree SHA of the skill's folder. It identifies the files that were assessed. It is not a commit.
d83f6ba- Next source check
- Oct 29, 2026
- Files
- 1 in the skill, 1 with findings (File structure)
- Record ID
30471bb
github-pr-review-sessionWhich scanners reported what
The overall score is A. It counts findings in every category. Security severity is Informational, the highest security finding across the scanners that ran (vettd reported none reported; cisco reported informational).
vettdNone reported0 security findingsciscoInformational0 security findingsSecurity findings
- Note
Not covered
Static checks only. Linked pages not fetched. Record not signed yet. Author details not verified. Framework checks not assessed.